Tidbit then we highly recommend using our library, especially as discord-components merges as of version 4.0. As a general rule of thumb, if you’re looking to do mainly slash commands and that There are other libraries of course though. Officially by us (but might be available as 3rd parties): Which means things such as these won’t be supported We already offer a lot of the integral API wrapperĪspects as discord.py does, however, we only specialize in interactions. The most biased answer would be to, of course, use interactions.py. Where should we go with discord.py being gone? ¶ It breaking, hence the “plastering” that is going on here. A missing class instance can easily lead to Must be returning back the exact same information that our objects depend on. It is very important to note here, though, that you send ( f "Member ID: " )īoth of these will be able to both run and give their proper value. command () async def borrowing ( ctx, member : interactions. What about the models, though? That’s a simple answer: The typical interactions.start() and dpy.run() methods because of synchronous/async functions.Īsyncio.gather() works with coroutines, hence the transition. This implementation uses asyncio.gather to executeīoth starts simultaneously as asyncio tasks, and runs them under one singular loop.Ĭompared to traditional startup commands, interactions.ready() and dpy.start() is used instead of Will both function properly as their respective libraries intend them to. run_until_complete ( gathered )īoth of these variables interactions and dpy will be able to run in the same established environment, and additionally gather ( task1, task2, loop = loop ) loop.
start ( token = ".", bot = True )) task1 = loop. send ( "Hello from discord-interactions!" ) loop = asyncio. command ( name = "test", description = "this is just a testing command." ) async def test ( ctx ): await ctx.
command () async def hello ( ctx ): await ctx. Import interactions from discord.ext import commands client = interactions. What does that mean? Well, we’ll show you: You will be able to run codeĪlongside one another, and you will be able to plug in some classes, but the data conversion must be exact. As it currently stands, interactions.py and discord.py are API wrappers. We’re essentially “plastering” support for discord.py instead of doing the surgery on its internal organs to make it work well Imagine it like taping a hole in the wall instead of repairing the wall. However, the term “work” is loosely structured here. Will discord.py be able to work with this library? ¶ That would make it nothing more than discord.py-interactions at that point – plus, we’re already a library that keeps very similar naming conventions as discord.py does, so this is pointless. The practicality of trying to support message commands will be infeasible since Discord Developers have already admitted that “not wanting to implement application commands” will not be a valid reason for applying for this privileged intent.įorking discord.py would be a massive change to our current codebase, throwing away all of the effort we’ve put into it so far, and basically just be rewriting how v2.0a was created. The message intent will inevitably be forced as a privileged intent in April 2022. Making this library unique in a sense that we only do this seemed reasonable and within our margin of standards at the time. The goal of this library is to solely implement support and integrate the use of interactions from the Discord API. Forking discord.py and building off of it does not change anything from our issue of avoiding this. The original purpose of this library was to act as an extension of discord.py, but due to the issue of constantly having to monkeypatch solutions into their codebase to keep our library working introduced extreme technical debt. There are/will be numerous forks out there for discord.py, and because of that, we cannot safely guarantee our ability to help users out who may be using their own form of modified code. The long answer is a list of numerous reasons as to why this decision was made: This is the official statement from the library developer regarding this: Are you going to/will/consider fork(ing) discord.py? ¶ Was made before Danny posted his gist on GitHub about ceasing development of discord.py. The decision to become a standalone library that is now an API wrapper for the Discord API discord.py is dead! Will this library die too? ¶ For anyĬomments, feedback or concerns please consider joining our serverĪnd bringing it up in our support channels. This page is maintained by the Helpers of the Discord server,Īnd developers at their discretion.
0 kommentar(er)
